nmlobi.blogg.se

1. The gone home incident august 2010 full#
2. The gone home incident august 2010 trial#
3. The gone home incident august 2010 download#

The opinion prohibits the commission from investigating “specific items of evidence that were tested or offered into evidence prior to” September 1, 2005. In July 2011, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott issued an opinion in response to questions from the commission about jurisdiction and authority. On April 15, 2011, the TFSC issued its final report in the Willingham / Willis cases. And on October 15, the Texas Forensic Science Commission discussed the case in depth at its regular meeting. On October 14, Texas Judge Charlie Baird held a hearing in the Willingham case to determine whether to hold a court of inquiry. The 16,000-word article by David Grann shows that all of the evidence used against Willingham was invalid, including the forensic analysis, the informant’s testimony, other witness testimony and additional circumstantial evidence. Rick Perry replaced key members of the panel, delayed the investigation for months.Īn investigative report in the September 7, 2009, issue of the New Yorker deconstructs every facet of the state’s case against Willingham. Days before the expert was set to testify, however, Gov.

The gone home incident august 2010 trial#

In 2009, an arson expert hired by the commission issued a report finding that experts who testified at Willingham’s trial should have known it was wrong at the time. The panel’s review was interrupted several times over the last two years, however, and continues today. In 2008, the Texas Forensic Science Commission agreed to investigate the case. In that case, Ernest Willis was exonerated and freed from prison because the forensic evidence was not valid.

Along with the Willingham case, the Innocence Project submitted information about another arson case in Texas where identical evidence was used to send another man to death row.

The gone home incident august 2010 full#

In 2006, the Innocence Project formally submitted the case to the Texas Forensic Science Commission, asking the empowered state entity to launch a full investigation. The Innocence Project assembled five of the nation’s leading independent arson experts to review the evidence in the case, and this prestigious group issued a 48-page report finding that none of the scientific analysis used to convict Willingham was valid.

Months after Willingham was executed, the Chicago Tribune published an investigative report that raised questions about the forensic analysis. Willingham was executed by lethal injection in Huntsville on February 17, 2004. Documents obtained by the Innocence Project show that state officials received that report but apparently did not act on it. Thirteen years later, in the days leading up to Willingham’s execution, his attorneys sent the governor and the Board of Pardon and Parole a report from Gerald Hurst, a nationally recognized arson expert, saying that Willingham’s conviction was based on erroneous forensic analysis.

The gone home incident august 2010 download#

( Download the full trial transcripts here.) On October 29, 1992, he was sentenced to death. He was convicted based on the testimony of forensic experts who said they had determined that the fire was intentionally set and a jailhouse informant who said Willingham had confessed to him. Willingham said he was asleep in the home when the fire started and always maintained his innocence. His wife was at the Salvation Army buying Christmas presents for the girls.Īt Willingham’s 1992 trial, prosecutors claimed he intentionally set fire to his home in order to kill his own children. Willingham, who was asleep when the fire started, survived. On December 23, 1991, a fire destroyed the Corsicana, Texas, home Cameron Todd Willingham shared with his wife and three daughters, killing the three girls. Myths and Facts About the Willingham Case.Texas Forensic Science Commission - History and Key Documents.